Legal Opinion

Sumida v. Pacific Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1942No. Civ. No. 13396PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment predicated upon the granting of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in an *474action brought pursuant to the provisions of section 11580, subdivision b(2) of the Insurance Code, for the purpose of compelling defendant to pay unsatisfied judgments previously recovered against the alleged insured of defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs (appellants), as we must in reviewing a judgment based on a directed verdict (In re Lances’ Estate, 216 Cal. 397, 400 [14 P. (2d) 768]), the material facts are:

Plaintiffs Sumida, Ishizuba,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Travelers Fire Insurance v. Brock & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Price v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Deeble v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Chambers v. SilverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Lamberte v. Public Service Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API