Legal Opinion
In Re Oppenheimer Funds Fees Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 10, 2006No. 04 Civ. 7022(JSR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
This document relates to All Actions.
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these consolidated cases (and proposed class action) are current and former shareholders in 23 of 51 Oppenheimer mutual funds (“the Funds”), all 51 of which are here named as “nominal defendants.” See Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) ¶¶ 18-38, 84. 1 Plaintiffs allege, in essence, that a parent corporation (OppenheimerFunds, Inc.), two affiliates (OppenheimerFunds Services and Oppenheimer-Funds Distributor, Inc.), and a group of trustees, directors, and officers common to the Funds, caused improper secret…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harhen v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Werbowsky v. CollombCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Evergreen Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re Franklin Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Smith v. StevensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013