Legal Opinion

Pedersen v. Powell County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1925No. 5,752Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defend- ant, entered upon an agreed statement of facts.

Section 3 of Rule X of this court, which now is and for many years past has been in force, requires, iriter alia, that the appellant’s brief shall contain (a) a concise abstract or statement of the case, presenting succinctly the questions involved and the manner in which they are raised; (b) a specification of errors relied upon, which shall be numbered and shall set out separately and particularly each error intended to be argued. Appellant’s brief in this case wholly ignores the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leyson v. RootMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Samuell v. Moore Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Casey v. ThieviegeMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Charles Schatzlein Paint Co. v. GodinMontana Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API