Legal Opinion

Ranza v. Nike, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 3, 2021No. 3:10-cv-01285Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON LOREDANA RANZA, Case No. 3:10-cv-1285-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation, NIKE EUROPEAN OPERATIONS NETHERLANDS, B.V., a foreign corporation, Defendants. Michael H. Simon, District Judge. United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation in this case on December 10, 2020. Judge Acosta recommended that this Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for relief under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as untimely and allow Plaintiff to proceed to a resolution on the merits of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Veba-Chemie A.G. v. M/v Getafix, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., in Rem, and Getafix Shipping Corp., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Compania Naviera Joanna SA v. Koninklijke Boskalis WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Castillo v. Shipping Corp. of IndiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API