Legal Opinion

Circle C Ranch Co. v. Jayo

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1983No. 13296PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice,

Retired.

This appeal arises out of an alleged breach of a provision in a lease agreement to transfer a forest service 300 head grazing permit. Plaintiff-respondent Circle C Ranch Company initially instituted this action in district court seeking forfeiture of the lease it had with defendants-appellants Paul and Gladys Jayo alleging they were in default on their first annual payment. Jayos answered, contending there was no default in the first payment and filed a counterclaim against Circle C for damages suffered when Circle C refused to transfer certain grazing permits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Conley v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lamb v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. GaleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Inland Group of Companies, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Spero v. Lockwood, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Rohr v. RohrIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Galindo v. HibbardIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API