Legal Opinion

Carney v. McDonald

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Writ of error to the Second Circuit Court of Shelby county. Ikying Halsey, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, C. J.

Anne Carney sued W. W. Etter in the Law-Court at Memphis, in replevin for seizing and detaining a carriage. -The writ was returned executed on *233Etter, but that the carriage was not in his possession. Declaration was filed, and plea of not guilty entered. John McDonald & Co. were substituted- as defendants in place of Etter, by consent of parties.

At the January Term, 1871, the case was tried by a jury, who . rendered a verdict for plaintiff for $73.57, on which judgment was rendered. On this judgment execution issued.

At the May Term, 1871, on motion of the defendants, the following order was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  2. Roller v. BurrowTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Roller v. BurrowTennessee Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API