Legal Opinion

Roller v. Burrow

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As both parties have filed petitions for certiorari, which was granted and arguments heard, the parties will be referred to herein as complainant and defendants, in accordance with their status in the Chancery Court. Two actions are involved in this appeal. One, an action by Will Roller, for the use and benefit of D.R. Bacon (to whom he had made an assignment), for rents and profits due him for the operation of a farm, under contract with John D. Thomas for whose estate the defendants were administrators. Second, an action by Will Roller for 115 shares of stock in the Sevier Terrace Realty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Crawford v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Davis v. RobertsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Elliott v. R. C. McNairy & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Carney v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ricky HARRIS v. STATE of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ricky HARRIS v. STATE of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API