Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Atanoff

Dauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided February 4, 1929No. 230Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hargest, P. J.,

This defendant is charged before William H. Charters, an alderman, in the City of Harrisburg, with the violation of section 1 of the Act of April 22, 1794, 3 Sm. Laws, 177. He was found guilty by the alderman and has appealed to this court. The facts have been agreed upon. The defendant is a barber, residing in the City of Harrisburg. On Sunday, Aug. 26, 1928, he had his place open for business and performed the usual business done in a barber shop that day for which he was paid the usual rates charged for such work.

The statute provides, in part: “If any person shall do or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GrannemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Johnston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  3. Commonwealth v. WaldmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Friedeborn v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. State v. FrederickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API