Legal Opinion

State v. Granneman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 4, 1896PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Hon. David Murphy, Judge. (1) The act under which defendant was prosecuted, “An act making it a misdemeanor for any person to carry on the business of barbering on Sunday”. (Laws of Mo. 1895, page 150) is in conflict with section 53 of article 4, and section 30 of article 2, of the constitution of this state and therefore void. State v. Loomis, 115 Mo. 307; State v. Willett, 54 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Hon. David Murphy, Judge. (1) The act under which defendant was prosecuted, “An act making it a misdemeanor for any person to carry on the business of barbering on Sunday”. (Laws of Mo. 1895, page 150) is in conflict with section 53 of article 4, and section 30 of article 2, of the constitution of this state and therefore void. State v. Loomis, 115 Mo. 307; State v. Willett, 54 Mo. App. 310; E. S. 1889, secs. 3852, 3854, 3855; JEx parte Westerjield, 55 Cal. 550; Stratton v. Morris, 89 Tenn. 497; State v. Sheriff, 48 Minn.-236; Bloom v.…

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

Under an information filed in the St. Louis court of criminal correction by the assistant prosecuting attorney of that court, charging the defendant with willfully and unlawfully carrying on' the business of barbering, in said city on Sunday, the thirtieth day of June, 1895, defendant was tried before a jury in said court on the sixteenth day of July, 1895, convicted, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25. From the judgment he appealed.

Defendant’s first contention is that- the act of the general assembly entitled, “An act making it a misdemeanor for any person to carry on the business of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FrederickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. State v. WellottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. City of Springfield v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  3. State ex rel. Wiles v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. McKaig v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. City of Denver v. BachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API