Legal Opinion

Brock v. Pearson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1891No. 13869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

This was.a suit to compel the conveyance of an undivided one-fourth interest in a tract of 704 acres of land in the county of Los Angeles. The trial court decreed the conveyance of a one-eighth interest, and the defendants appealed.

The general features of the case are as follows: On the 9th of June, 1887, the owner of the land, one A. W. Timms, gave the plaintiff a contract of sale thereof for the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars. The defendant Pearson was desirous of acquiring the property, and instructed one PI. y. Burner to negotiate for its purchase. The latter effected an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heinlen v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Crook v. ForsythCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Hilton v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Bernal v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rice v. California Lutheran HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Humphrey v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Cruz v. El Registrador de San GermánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1923
  5. Cruz v. Registrar of San GermánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API