Legal Opinion

Eldridge v. Walker

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lawrence

In June, 1848, John Frink and Martin O. Walker were co-partners in business in the city of Chicago, and as such partners, were joint owners of certain lots, which are the subject matter- of the present controversy. Walker, under pretense of having sold these lots to Thomas Dyer, procured the execution of a deed by Frink to Dyer, the deed being also executed by himself. The nominal consideration was $2500, which sum, however, ivas not paid by Dyer, but by Walker, and was used by him for the benefit of the firm. Dyer, in fact, was not a purchaser, and had no interest whatever in the property,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VernilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Eldridge v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Commonwealth Finance Corp. v. McHargCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. Commonwealth v. MimmsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. MimmsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API