Legal Opinion
Kirchenberg v. Ainsworth Pet Nutrition, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 19, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00690Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Erin Kirchenberg, on behalf of herself and all No. 2:20-cv-00690-KJM-DMC others similarly situated, 12 ORDER B Plaintiff, 14 15 Ainsworth, Pet Nutrition, Inc., and J.M. Smucker Co., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Erin Kirchenberg brings this putative class action against defendants claiming 19 | defendants misrepresented the ingredients in pet food she purchased in violation of the 20 | Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301, breach of implied and express warranty, and 21 | violation of state…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.