Legal Opinion

Donald W. Berry v. American Cyanamid Company (Lederle Laboratories, a Division of American Cyanamid Company)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1965No. 15696_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CECIL, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents questions of law concerning the sufficiency of the plaintiff-appellant’s complaint in the District Court. Donald W. Berry, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, brought this action in a state court of Tennessee to recover damages in the amount of $100,000 from the American Cyanamid Company, defendant-appellee herein. The defendant-appellee will be referred to hereinafter as Lederle, the familiar name of its laboratory division. Lederle removed the case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Eastern Division, on the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Anderson-Weber, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Robert D. Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., and Third-Party v. Kay-See Dental Manufacturing Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Snawder v. CohenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1990
  3. Johnson v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965
  4. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API