Legal Opinion

Edward Crosby v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1981No. 81-1037PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

After a four-year period of receiving Social Security disability benefits, Mr. Crosby was notified that improvement in his condition rendered him no longer disabled and that these benefits would be and were terminated. The court below found that the Secretary’s decision was supported by substantial evidence. Agreeing, we affirm.

We note in passing Mr. Crosby’s argument that, to employ counsel’s phraseology, “the so-called burden of proof” should be upon the Secretary in termination cases such as this. We find no warrant for the view that the factual findings of the Secretary are to be tested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John G. Myers v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. Ramon M. Rivas v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Marker v. FinchDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  4. Watson v. GardnerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1965
  5. Maynard v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1962

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Douglas GARNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. Vivian G. Schauer v. Richard Schweiker, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Edgar E. Simpson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Smith v. Ransom v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Dorothy M. VAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API