Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Interstate Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1921PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Petition by plaintiff to rebear, case decided at tbis term, ante, p. 292.

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, J.

Tbis case was before tbe Court at tbe present term, and a new trial awarded for error in tbe admission of incompetent opinion evidence. Tbe plaintiff files a petition to rebear and asks tbat tbe former decision be reversed and tbat tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court on tbe verdict be affirmed.

It was alleged in tbe complaint, as one of tbe main grounds of actionable negligence, and denied in tbe answer, tbat tbe defendants bad failed to furnish tbe plaintiff, an employee, a reasonably safe place to 'work. Chester Whitaker, a witness for tbe plaintiff, who bad examined tbe place on Tickers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Withrow v. . DepriestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. . HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Edwards v. National Council, Junior Order United American Mechanics Beneficiary DegreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. McKay v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API