Legal Opinion · Concurrence
State v. . Williams
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 10, 1941PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1ConcurrenceBarnhill, J.
STACY, C. J., and WINBORNE, J., join in concurring opinion. The following bill of indictment was sent to the grand jury, who returned a true bill.
"The jurors of the State, upon their oath, present: That O. B. Williams and Lillie Shaver Hendrix, late of the County of Caldwell, on the 4th day of October, in the year of our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Forty, with force and arms, at and in the county aforesaid, unlawfully, wilfully and feloniously did get married to each other in the City of Las Vegas in the State of Nevada, and thereafter returned to the State of North Carolina and did…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Crouch v. CrouchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- McFarland v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.