Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sprenger v. Bickle

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 2013No. Docket No. 310599Published

1DissentBoonstra, J.

At a time when too many fathers are running from their parental responsibilities, plaintiff in this case is running toward his.1 He seeks to affirm, under the Paternity Act, MCL 722.711 et seq., his parentage of the minor child. Specifically, he requests genetic testing to establish paternity, joint physical custody of the child (including specified parenting time for plaintiff and defendant), and a determination of support in accordance with the Michigan Child Support Formula.

The trial court dismissed plaintiffs complaint for lack of standing, and the majority affirms. I agree with the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. MungoMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Girard v. WagenmakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API