Legal Opinion

Hill v. Cross Country Settlements, LLC

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 5, 2007No. 2283, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARER, J.

“The rule of law and equity is that money paid under mistake may be recovered when it is against good conscience for the recipient to retain the money.” Debelius Realty Co. v. Chassagne, 260 Md. 109, 114, 271 A.2d 527 (1970). That maxim was never more appropriate than in the instant case, which involves principles of unjust enrichment.

Kathleen Hill appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, which denied her motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment, and granted summary judgment in favor of appellee, Cross Country Settlements, LLC.

Appellant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Goodwich v. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade Healthcare, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  3. Jackson v. 2109 Brandywine, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API