Hall v. Kornfeld-Harper Well Servicing Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This was a death claim for compensation under our workmen’s compensation law. The trial court made findings of fact and allowed compensation. Respondents have appealed and contend *71(1) there was no substantial, competent evidence to support the material findings of the court, and (2) that respondents were prejudiced for want of statutory notice of the accident.
Respondents were partners in the oil well servicing business. In January, 1942, they employed Jesse H. Iiall to operate a servicing unit. This unit had a seat from which he could reach…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holler v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- McMillan v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Guiles v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Woods v. Jacob Dold Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Hatch's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stanley v. United Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Burk v. American District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Cody v. Lewis & West Transit MixSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Johnson v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Poehlman v. LeydigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.