Legal Opinion

In Re MacDonnell's Estate

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1936No. 3130PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is the contention of appellants that:

1. The provision of sec. 9700 N.C.L. which states that the court "may" set apart exempt property vests the court in discretion in considering and acting upon such applications; 2. The provisions of sec. 9700 N.C.L. have no application to estates in which summary administration has been ordered, as in the one at bar; and

3. That the petitioner is estopped to claim any part of the insurance money as against the preferred claim of Ross-Burke Company for funeral expenses.

The trial court should ascertain the needs of the family of deceased, and then, in its…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re Estate of BallentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Estate of WalleyNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  3. In Re Estate of MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Estate of EhlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Kapp v. KappNevada Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. French v. FrenchNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  2. NEV. POLICY RESEARCH INST. v. MILLERNevada Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API