In Re MacDonnell's Estate
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
It is the contention of appellants that:
1. The provision of sec. 9700 N.C.L. which states that the court "may" set apart exempt property vests the court in discretion in considering and acting upon such applications; 2. The provisions of sec. 9700 N.C.L. have no application to estates in which summary administration has been ordered, as in the one at bar; and
3. That the petitioner is estopped to claim any part of the insurance money as against the preferred claim of Ross-Burke Company for funeral expenses.
The trial court should ascertain the needs of the family of deceased, and then, in its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re Estate of BallentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Estate of WalleyNevada Supreme Court · 1876
- In Re Estate of MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Estate of EhlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Kapp v. KappNevada Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- French v. FrenchNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- NEV. POLICY RESEARCH INST. v. MILLERNevada Supreme Court · 2024