Legal Opinion

Armentrout v. FMC Corporation

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1991No. 88CA1404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

In this product liability action, plaintiffs, Lynn Armentrout and his wife, Tina Ar-mentrout, appeal the trial court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendant, FMC Corporation. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

While working as an oiler, plaintiff Lynn Armentrout was crushed between the stationary truck base and the rotating superstructure of a crane constructed by defendant. Plaintiffs asserted four product liability claims against defendant: strict liability for failure to warn, strict liability for design defect, negligent failure to warn, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Union Supply Co. v. PustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Uptain v. Huntington Lab, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armentrout v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Vista Resorts, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Armentrout v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Armentrout v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API