Armentrout v. FMC Corporation
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge NEY.
In this product liability action, plaintiffs, Lynn Armentrout and his wife, Tina Ar-mentrout, appeal the trial court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendant, FMC Corporation. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
While working as an oiler, plaintiff Lynn Armentrout was crushed between the stationary truck base and the rotating superstructure of a crane constructed by defendant. Plaintiffs asserted four product liability claims against defendant: strict liability for failure to warn, strict liability for design defect, negligent failure to warn, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Union Supply Co. v. PustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Uptain v. Huntington Lab, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Armentrout v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Vista Resorts, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Armentrout v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Armentrout v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992