Legal Opinion

Paiko v. Boeynaems

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal prom Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J..The complainants exhibited their amended bill in equity to' a circuit judge of the first judicial circuit, the principal facts set forth therein being as follows: That one Manuel Paiko died at Honolulu on or about the 1st day of April, 1890, leaving a will which was thereafter duly admitted to probate, a copy thereof being made part of the bill; that the testator left surviving him a widow, since deceased, also a son, Joseph Paiko, and a grandson, Joseph Paiko-, Jr., complainants; that among the properties owned by the testator at the time of his death…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Devine v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Kahoiwai v. LimaeuHawaii Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Flores v. MakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Ahmi v. AshfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Paiko v. BoeynaemsHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In re Estate KaienaHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Spencer v. BishopHawaii Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Enos v. BergerHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Hawaiian Trust Co. v. PogueHawaii Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API