Legal Opinion

Kilts v. Seeber

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1854PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion, on behalf of plaintiff, asking for an order directing the clerk of Madison county to adjust full costs to the plaintiff, and enter the same in the judgment roll with the verdict; and also to set aside the adjustment of defendant’s costs.

1Opinion of the Court

Crippen, Justice.

This action was commenced by service of a summons and complaint on the 3d of March, 1854. On the 20th of March, the defendant’s attorneys served an answtir, and at the same time served the plaintiff’s attorney with a written offer to let judgment be entered against the defendant, in favor of the plaintiff, for the sum of two hundred and forty-one dollars and fifty cents, with costs of the action. The offer was made under § 385 of the Code. The plaintiff gave no notice of acceptance of the offer. Afterwards, and *271after the time had elapsed in which such notice of acceptance…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Yates v. FrenchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Thornall v. CrawfordNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Campbell-Ewald v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API