Legal Opinion

Schwarz v. Hatch

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1941No. Civ. No. 11698PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J., pro tem.

Appeal on the judgment roll alone from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $1617.60, which amount the court found due from defendants to plaintiffs as their share of the proceeds from oil produced by the “Hub No. 1” well at Signal Hill. Defendants had cross-complained for the sum of $65,000 for moneys alleged to have been paid by defendants to and for the benefit of plaintiffs. The court found against this claim, both upon the merits and because of the statute of limitations.

The findings of fact evidently were carefully drawn and considered and disclose the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. MacDonald v. Reich & Lievre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Holmes v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sketchley v. LipkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API