Legal Opinion
Hale v. Pan Am Railways, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–10855–NMGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorton, J.
This case arises from an accident that occurred during the unloading of a railcar in February, 2015. Plaintiffs Michael and Alla Hale ("plaintiffs" or "the Hales") bring this action against Pan Am Railways, Inc. ("Pan Am"), Americold Logistics LLC ("Americold") and Cryo-Trans, Inc. ("Cryo-Trans") (collectively "defendants"), alleging that defendants were negligent in their operation of Railcar CRYX 5017 which caused Mr. Hale's injuries.
Pending before the Court are the motions to dismiss of defendants Pan Am and Cryo-Trans (Docket No. 18 and 20). For the following reasons, Pan Am's motion to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Labranche v. United States Liability Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
- Petrosyan v. Maserati North America, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Vermont Mutual Insurance Co., as subrogee of Barbara and Gregory Sanders v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026