Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 3, 1980No. 35451PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Judge.

Respondent telephone company, a regulated public utility, installed an answering machine in the dwelling of a customer, who was insured by petitioner. Thereafter, a fire occurred and petitioner brought suit on the customer’s subrogated cause of action to recover damages, alleging negligence in providing faulty equipment. The trial court sustained a motion for summary judgment in favor of respondent on the ground that claim had not been presented within 60 days after the fire as would be required by a provision of a General Subscriber Services Tariff then in effect. The Court of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Esteve Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. So. Bell T. T. Co. v. Georgia Pub. Ser. Comm.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Invenchek, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Taffet v. Southern Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Estate of Pearson v. Interstate Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. South Cent. Bell v. EppsMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Cerulean Companies, Inc. v. TillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API