Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abelino ARCHULETA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DUFFY’S INC., Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1973No. 72-1307Published

1DissentWilliam E. Doyle, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion the trial judge correctly rejected the contention that the court had not gained jurisdiction over the case within the 30-day limit provided by § 2000e.

While I do not disagree with the facts as stated in the majority opinion, I see, in view of the position I take, a need for extending the fact statement briefly. There is need to emphasize, for example, that Denver Pop Company, the concern named in the original complaint, and Duffy’s Inc. did have some relationship and that Duffy’s had actual notice of the filing of the action.

On October 15, 1969, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. A. H. Fischer Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  5. The Travelers Indemnity Company v. United States of America for the Use of Construction Specialties CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API