Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER
KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge:
Four proposed intervenors—the Estate of Daniel Wultz, Sheryl Wultz, Yekutiel “Tuly” Wultz, and Amanda Wultz (“Intervenors”)— seek to join this action as plaintiffs, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a), (b). They argue that their intervention is timely and as of right; the existing plaintiffs in this action vehemently disagree. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the motion to intervene.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
As the participants in this action are well aware, more than 1,000 party plaintiffs have actively pursued this asset…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Mastercard International Inc. v. Visa International Service Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- In Re Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation, Gizella WeisshausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- "R" Best Produce, Inc. v. Shulman-Rabin MarketingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Republic of the Philippines v. AbayaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Affordo, Inc. v. Guangzhou Xingxing Cotton Technology R&D Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Broccolino v. Clearview AI, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Burke v. Clearview AI, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Calderon v. Clearview AI, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.