Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Gatwood

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1998No. 97-2674; No. 98-831PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In Toledo Bar Assn. v. Gatwood (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 610, 522 N.E.2d 523, we publicly reprimanded respondent. In Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 304, 677 N.E.2d 1182, we indefinitely suspended him. These two new matters present additional incidents that occurred during and after the period of his infractions in Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood.

*229In these cases, as in Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood, respondent failed to perform services for which he was retained and failed to return client funds. In that previously reported case, and in this one, respondent also wrote…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. SternerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. ChurillaOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. ArmonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GatwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. GatwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Toledo Bar Assn. v. GatwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API