Polanski v. Polanski
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The defendant has appealed from a decree granting the plaintiff a divorce and awarding her certain portions of his properties.
We have carefully examined the testimony, and think it is sufficient in this case to state our conclusion that the court was right in its decision that the plaintiff was entitled to a divorce. In that regard the decree will be affirmed.
The question that has given us most concern has to do with the property award.
The parties are owners as tenants by the entireties of the following properties in Salem, Oregon: Their home; an adjoining property known as the Home Court,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Siebert v. SiebertOregon Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barone v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Esselstyn v. CASTEELOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Alk v. LaniniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Koufasimes v. KoufasimesOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Brandt v. BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.