Legal Opinion
Berroteran v. Quirk and Tratos
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 27, 2025No. 2:21-cv-00396Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 ABELARDO BERROTERAN Case No. 2:21-cv-00396-RFB-EJY 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 QUIRK AND TRATOS, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Abelardo Berroteran’s Motion for Relief of Judgment 14 (ECF No. 49) and his Emergency Motions for a Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 52) and 15 Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 53). For the following reasons, the Court denies each of 16 Plaintiff’s Motions. 17 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiff Berroteran initiated this patent infringement action by applying to proceed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Reno Air Racing Association, Inc. v. Jerry McCordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.