Legal Opinion

State v. Badda

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1965No. 37794PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an application for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the superior court, in which the indigent petitioner asserts that he was denied his constitutional right to be furnished a complete statement of facts, at county expense, in connection with his appeal from a second conviction on two counts charging him with robbery. The petition is worded as if he were asking for a writ of mandamus. It is obvious from his brief that the issues raised pertain to an alleged constitutional error of the trial court in denying him a full statement of facts. We, therefore, treat the issues as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In RE WOODS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Thurston Cnty. Ex Rel. Snaza v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API