Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 14, 1993No. 29841-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Lavargo Thomas seeks discretionary review of the Superior Court's refusal to authorize transcription at public expense of certain portions of the verbatim report of proceedings pursuant to an order of indigency. See RAP 15.2(g). The State has filed no response. A commissioner referred the motion to a panel of judges for determination. We grant discretionary review, accelerate review pursuant to RAP 18.12, and reverse.

Lavargo Thomas was convicted of one count of delivering cocaine. At sentencing, he sought an exceptional sentence below the standard range. The sentencing judge denied Thomas'…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TiltonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. TiltonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. State v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API