Sindall v. H. C. Thacker & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
United States Courts. Service. Sheriff. Venue. Domicil. Waiver. Jurisdiction. Judgments. Before Judge Hall. Spalding Superior Court. February Term, 1875. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Judge.
1. Thacker & Company moved a rule against the sheriff to show cause why certain funds raised from the sale of Sindall’s property should not be paid to them. Certain creditors holding junior liens attacked the judgment of Thacker & Company, on the ground that Sindall was not served, and the United States district court for the northern district, therefore, had no jurisdiction, and on the further ground that the judgment was fraudulently obtained in that court; and again, because that court allowed an amendment of the declaration of Thacker & Company, which was never served. The…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Pace v. PaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Cox v. PottsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Perkerson v. PerkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Bell v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959