F.E. Gates Co. v. Hydro-Technologies, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOK, Judge.
Case Summary
F.E. Gates Company, a division of the Blakley Corporation (“Gates”), appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Hydro-Technologies, Inc. (“Hydro-Tech”) on Hydro-Tech’s claim for wrongful termination of a subcontract.
We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Gates raises three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as:(1) whether the trial court erred when it denied Gates’ motions for judgment on the evidence; and(2) whether the trial court properly instructed the jury.
Facts and Procedural History
Hydro-Tech is a specialty contractor in the field of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First Federal Savings Bank of Indiana v. Key Markets, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Perry v. GossIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ruff v. Charter Behavioral Health System of Northwest Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Jacobs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reginald Martin Agency, Inc. v. Conseco Medical InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005
- Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Vigo Coal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Vigo Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Nephrology Specialists, P.C., Shahabul Arfeen, M.D., Sanjeev Rastogi, M.D., Maher Ajam, M.D., and Raied Abdullah, M.D. v. Asim Chughtai, M.D., Rafael Fletes, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013