Legal Opinion

F.E. Gates Co. v. Hydro-Technologies, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 2000No. 02A03-9812-CV-505PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOK, Judge.

Case Summary

F.E. Gates Company, a division of the Blakley Corporation (“Gates”), appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Hydro-Technologies, Inc. (“Hydro-Tech”) on Hydro-Tech’s claim for wrongful termination of a subcontract.

We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

Gates raises three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as:(1) whether the trial court erred when it denied Gates’ motions for judgment on the evidence; and(2) whether the trial court properly instructed the jury.

Facts and Procedural History

Hydro-Tech is a specialty contractor in the field of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings Bank of Indiana v. Key Markets, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Perry v. GossIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Ruff v. Charter Behavioral Health System of Northwest Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Jacobs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reginald Martin Agency, Inc. v. Conseco Medical InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005
  2. Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Vigo Coal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Utica Mutual Insurance v. Vigo Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Nephrology Specialists, P.C., Shahabul Arfeen, M.D., Sanjeev Rastogi, M.D., Maher Ajam, M.D., and Raied Abdullah, M.D. v. Asim Chughtai, M.D., Rafael Fletes, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API