Legal Opinion

Miller v. Board of Education

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided February 22, 1971No. 6373PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRATCHER, District Judge.

The immediate question confronting this Court is whether both defendants are entitled to a summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Neither the plaintiff nor defendant filed affidavits with their memorandums arguing the merits of the controversy.

Rule 56 is a procedural device for the disposition of cases in which there is no material issue of fact, and its purpose- is to eliminate the formal trial of eases where only questions of law are involved.

This Court, therefore, is authorized under the plain provisions of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mrs. Lola Hornsby v. Ivan Allen, Mayor of the City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Pen-Ken Gas & Oil Corp. v. Warfield Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. McGuire v. ToddCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. United States v. DaubendiekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  5. Appolonio v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gwathmey v. AtkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1976
  2. Molinos De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Sheridan Towing Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API