Legal Opinion
Eisler v. Clark
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 5, 1948No. Civ. 1173-48-1177-48PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDSBOROUGH, Associate Justice.
The Court delivered the following opinion orally in granting the relief prayed for in the plaintiffs’ motion.
The Court. Gentlemen, in these cases the defendant on the fundamental question takes the position that the Deportation Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 157, does not require a hearing in the wording of the Statute, and that therefore the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., that is, the sections which are in issue here, do not apply.
On that question the Court is of the opinion that the Courts have read due process into the Act, and du'e process…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- J. C. Penney Co. v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Yiakoumis v. HallDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.