Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Hackney
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
It seems to be settled by the decisions of the federal courts that a railroad employee who is engaged in the work of delivering at the place of use material to be used in the repair, construction, or operation of those instrumentalities directly used by the railroad company in the business of interstate commerce, such as rolling stock, station houses, and roadways, is himself “employed in such commerce,” within the meaning of the federal Act (Fed. St. Ann. 1909 Supp. p. 584 [45 USCA §§ 51-59; U. S. Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665]). Pedersen v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 229 U. S. 146, 33 S. Ct. 648, 57…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. YurkonisSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Davis v. CastileTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Southern Railway v. GuytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Connors v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932