Rojas v. X Motorsport, Inc.

ORDER

Edwin Rojas asserts claims against X Motorsport, a car dealership, for violations of the Truth in Lending Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1601, in connection with a financed sale. He argues that the disclosed terms of financing were not “meaningful” because they did not state that the sale depended on approval from a financier. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment, and the district court granted the defendant’s motion. Because another agreement that Rojas signed stated the sale was conditioned on approved financing, we affirm.

Rojas visited the X Motorsport store in 2016 to purchase a used car.…