Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Mitchell's

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Certificate from the Court of Nisi Prius. This was an action of debt by Robert J. Douglass against J. Eastburn Mitchell, executor of Thomas S. Mitchell, deceased, on the following instruments:— $3500. On demand, I promise to pay Robert J. Douglass, or order, thirty-five hundred dollars, with interest from date (without defalcation) for value received.

Read the full summary

Certificate from the Court of Nisi Prius. This was an action of debt by Robert J. Douglass against J. Eastburn Mitchell, executor of Thomas S. Mitchell, deceased, on the following instruments:— $3500. On demand, I promise to pay Robert J. Douglass, or order, thirty-five hundred dollars, with interest from date (without defalcation) for value received. And I do hereby confess judgment therefor, and release errors; and I hereby also waive all siay of execution from and after the maturity of the above note. Witness my hand and seal this first day of December, A. d. 1852. Thos. S. Mitchell.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Strong, J.

The bill single and the promissory note given in evidence, made out a primé facie ease against the defendant. The signature to the instruments is admitted to have been genuine, but the defence is, that no consideration passed from Douglass to Mitchell for the instruments; that no money was loaned as the plaintiff claims, and from this it is inferred, that the instruments must have been forgeries written over genuine signatures. The disputed ground of the case, therefore, was in the question, whether Thomas S. Mitchell had actually received…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Hepps v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Mendenhall v. MendenhallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Fanning v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Madden Et Ux. v. Great A. P. Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API