LeDoux v. Continental Ins. Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEYER, Circuit Judge *
As the result of an automobile collision, the Van Scoyks sued Kurt LeDoux, Gabrielle LeDoux and the LeDoux & LeDoux partnership. The Van Scoyks contend that Kurt LeDoux failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right of way, stop at a stop sign, keep his automobile under reasonable control, and that he was speeding. They seek punitive damages contending that the conduct was “outrageous, of reckless indifference ... and demonstrated gross negligence.”
The LeDouxs seek a declaratory judgment that the policy issued to them by Continental Insurance Company would…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Lazenby Ex Rel. Lazenby v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Carroway v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. PowellDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998