Legal Opinion

Kahan v. Greenfield

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1949No. Appeal, 69PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellant seeks a decree in equity to compel defendant to reconvey a bouse and lot which he avers she procured from him by fraud and undue influence. He also alleged, and she admitted, that he had deposited with her from time-to time sums aggregating $186.31. The learned chancellor found facts and conclusions of law and entered a decree nisi ordering only the refund of $186.31. The court en banc overruled appellant’s exceptions. The final decree, besides requiring repayment of the deposit, adjudged defendant owner of the property, subject to appellant’s possession and use…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leedom v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Brooks v. ConstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Drob v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Christy v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Boyd v. KilmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glessner v. Security-Peoples Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Glessner v. Security-Peoples Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API