Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Michelman & Michelman

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.

Motion to compel arbitration is denied. While a right of visitation is involved as against a right of custody, as in Matter of Hill (199 Misc. 1035) one of the cases there relied upon withheld approval of an award of arbitrators which was concerned with a right of visitation (Wattman v. Wattman, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 15, 1940, p. 221, col. 7). Either custody or visitation, however, is a matter involving the well-being of a child. This well-being is not only the primary object of parents, as was recognized by the parties to the agreement sub judice, but is also a primary interest to the State…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. In re the Arbitration between Publishers' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. In re HillNew York Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sheets v. SheetsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. Avco Corporation v. PreteskaConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
  3. Fence v. FenceNew York City Family Court · 1970
  4. In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Agency, Inc. & HolzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API