In re the Arbitration between Michelman & Michelman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.
Motion to compel arbitration is denied. While a right of visitation is involved as against a right of custody, as in Matter of Hill (199 Misc. 1035) one of the cases there relied upon withheld approval of an award of arbitrators which was concerned with a right of visitation (Wattman v. Wattman, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 15, 1940, p. 221, col. 7). Either custody or visitation, however, is a matter involving the well-being of a child. This well-being is not only the primary object of parents, as was recognized by the parties to the agreement sub judice, but is also a primary interest to the State…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In re the Arbitration between Publishers' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- In re HillNew York Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sheets v. SheetsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Avco Corporation v. PreteskaConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
- Fence v. FenceNew York City Family Court · 1970
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Agency, Inc. & HolzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.