Legal Opinion

Locke v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 10, 2007No. 06-629TPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.

This ease is before the court after briefing on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant challenges jurisdiction over a claim for damages based on a wrongful tax levy. Argument is deemed unnecessary.

BACKGROUND

As an initial matter, the court is compelled to point out that the pleading and brief filed by plaintiffs’ counsel were deficient in almost every respect. Some egregious errors include incorrect case citations; case names without any citations; statutes that have…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cherbanaeff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Janaskie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Resource Conservation Group, LLC v. United States Deparment of NavyUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Wall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API