Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Johnson & Johnson Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 9, 1959No. 37299PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

Counsel for the plaintiff insists that the trial judge erred in not sustaining his demurrer to the amendment and in not sustaining his motion to compel the defendant to pay all accrued costs because the defendant did not attach an affidavit to the amendment .stating that it was not filed for the purpose of delay. The defendant filed an affidavit on the date of the hearing which did not meet all the requirements of Code § 81-1310, but did aver that the amendment was not offered for purposes of delay. Generally it is within the court’s discretion as to whether the amendment will…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Mackin v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Roberson v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Wolters Village Management Company, Graybar Electric Company, and T. R. Barnard v. The Merchants and Planters National Bank of ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. Federal Land Bank v. Blackshear BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fricks v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Fulton County v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API