Legal Opinion
United States v. Kenneth Bell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 29, 2017No. 16-1209 & 16-1325PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The Supreme Court’s.decision in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), might seem a bit strange to someone who thought that the adversary system in criminal cases allows each side to adopt a “no holds barred” litigation stance. But that is not the .way the Constitution structures criminal procedure. From the Fifth Amendment's’ privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, to its double-jeopardy clause, to the rights conferred by the Sixth Amendment both to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation and to-be confronted with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Jeff BoydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Jeremiah EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Torrie KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. KhouriCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. John JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Higgenbottom v. MeisnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.