Legal Opinion

Higgenbottom v. Meisner

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 13, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01256Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DELANTE DARNELL HIGGENBOTTOM, Petitioner, Case No. 21-CV-1256-JPS-JPS v. ORDER WARDEN MICHAEL MEISNER, Respondent. 1. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Petitioner Delante Darnell Higgenbottom’s (“Petitioner”) petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The Court screened the petition under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings and found that all four of Petitioner’s grounds for relief survived screening. ECF No. 4. Respondent Warden Michael Meisner (“Respondent”) answered the petition,…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API