Legal Opinion

Bereslavsky v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 19, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit seeking injunctive relief and an accounting for profits and damages.

Plaintiff moves for leave to amend its complaint by striking allegations relating to equitable relief and substituting allegations seeking money damages. The basis for the motion appears to be that the patent has expired and with it the plaintiff’s right to injunctive relief. The only claim he now has, says the plaintiff, is for money damages arising out of defendant’s infringement.

The defendant questions the necessity of this amendment. This objection is not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grauman v. City Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alcoa S. S. Co., Inc. v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Bereslavsky v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  4. Hamm v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API