Legal Opinion

Grauman v. City Co. of New York, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 20, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The defendants move, pursuant to Rules 8, 10, 12, and 18 of the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, (1) to dismiss the amended complaint on the grounds: (a) that whereas this is an action in equity it appears on the face of the complaint that no grounds for equitable jurisdiction or relief are alleged; and (b) that the plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law; or in the alternative, (2) requiring the plaintiffs respectivetively to separately state and number each cause of action for rescission of the purchase in California of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MantonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. Bellavance v. Plastic-Craft Novelty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
  3. Lyons Milling Co. v. Goffe & Carkener, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok PoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coca-Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  3. Rodgers v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  4. Fitzpatrick v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  5. Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API