Legal Opinion

United Nuclear Corp. v. Cannon

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided April 29, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-0521 SPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SELYA, District Judge.

This action was originally brought by United Nuclear Corporation (“UNC”) to challenge the validity of a statute enacted by the Rhode Island General Assembly, S. 924, P.L.1981, ch. 85 (“S.924”) which imposed a $10,000,000. bonding requirement upon plaintiff in an effort to insure adequate decontamination in and around its nuclear facility at Wood River Junction, Charlestown, Rhode Island. Following the granting of partial summary judgment and the issuance of declaratory and injunctive relief in favor of UNC, United Nuclear Corporation v. Cannon, 553 F.Supp. 1220…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Spell v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Metropolitan District Commission, Conservation Law Foundation of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Andrew S. Jacobs v. Anthony Mancuso, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. In Re Immune Response Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API